![]() NVIDIA NVFlash with Certificate Checks Bypassed. V5.287 Jun 6th, 2016 + 4 previous versions; Kepler BIOS Tweaker. V1.27 Oct 14th, 2015 Maxwell II BIOS Tweaker. The SAPPHIRE HD 7870 GHz Edition OC, factory-overclocked to 1050 MHz engine and effective 5000 MHz memory, offers superior performance than standard models. Description: This release of ATI Catalyst™ delivers support for the latest ATI CrossFireX™ profiles in a separate executable file ensuring users have access to the absolute latest set of profiles installed on their PC. New profiles added to this release: - Battlefield 3 – Provides great CrossFire scaling and resolves stuttering issues when running in CrossFire mode - Deus Ex Missing Link: Improves CrossFire performance - F1 2011: Improves CrossFire performance - Dead Island: Improves CrossFire performance - Batman Arkham City (DX9 version): Improves CrossFire performance - NBA 2012: Disables CrossFire. Downloads Free! 44 Drivers for Sapphire HD 6970 2GB GDDR5 PCIE graphics. Here's where you can download Free! The newest software for your HD 6970. Description: This release of AMD Catalyst™ delivers support for the latest AMD CrossFireX™ profiles in a separate executable file ensuring users have access to the absolute latest set of profiles installed on their PC. New profiles added to this release: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3: Improves CrossFire performance - Saints Row 3 (DirectX 9 version): Improves CrossFire performance - Serious Sam 3: Improves CrossFire performance - Java Control Panel: Fixes black screen corruption seen on single and multi GPU configurations when Anti-Aliasing is forced on through the Catalyst Control Center. • • • • Update: 2017.12.13 Preset:1080 – Radeon RX Vega 64 CrossFire – Radeon RX Vega 64 Update: 2017.12.12 – added Preset:2160 scores. – added GTX 1080 2-way SLI P1080 score. Update: 2016.08.25 Preset:1080 – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti – Radeon RX 470 Update: 2014.11.10 Preset:1080 – Update: 2014.09.24 Preset:1080 – – GeForce GTX TITAN – Here are the charts of scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing). Each entry includes the model of the graphics card with clock speeds, the TPC (Total Power Consumption) of the at idle and under full load, the max GPU temperature and the graphics driver version. FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000. These charts will be updated as regularly as possible with new graphics cards or new graphics drivers (only if there are significant changes in performance). Three kind of scores are available on these charts: • Preset:1080: 1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box • Preset:720: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box • Custom preset: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box 1 – Preset:1080 Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode) Other scores can be found online in section. As much as I hate to feedback on a hard day work of blood & sweat, it seems work itself is still in progress, thus I continue. There’s a headline all over a week ago. I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. You know all I’m interested these days, is in Intel HD GFX ? which are probably still under-testing as aren’t there in above charts. Hope this helps in some way. • Peter Jerome, somethings wrong here. I ran the test @ 1280×720, following your criteria, with exception being windowed and not full-screen as crap 19-inch “HD-LED” wont switch to full at that resolution. Results: SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) so whats’ wrong? Well check the 4th line: FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2 I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. Tested more than twice. It remained at “avg:4” in warm-ups and never went below “avg=3” during benchmarking, the whole time. So what’s the formula here my man. Its not adding up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2019
Categories |